The Negatives of Renouncing a Token Smart Contract

2 min readMay 30


Renouncing a token smart contract means relinquishing ownership and control over the contract, making it irreversible and immutable. While there are potential benefits to renouncing a token smart contract, it’s essential to consider the negatives as well. Here are some potential drawbacks:

1. Lack of Upgradability: Renouncing a smart contract means that any future updates or improvements to the token’s functionality or security cannot be implemented. This lack of upgradability may limit the token’s ability to adapt to changing market conditions or address potential vulnerabilities.

2. Inability to Intervene: Once a smart contract is renounced, there is no way to intervene or address issues that may arise. If unforeseen problems or vulnerabilities emerge in the contract, there will be no possibility of making changes or rectifying the situation.

3. Limited Governance: Renouncing a smart contract eliminates any governance capabilities, as there will be no entity or individual with the authority to make decisions or implement changes based on community consensus. This lack of governance may hinder the token’s ability to evolve and respond to community needs or emerging trends.

4. Potential for Scams: Renounced contracts can be attractive targets for scammers. Malicious actors may create fraudulent tokens or exploit vulnerabilities in the code, knowing that there is no possibility of intervention or recovery once the contract is renounced. This can lead to financial losses and damage to the token’s reputation.

5. Reduced Investor Confidence: Renouncing a smart contract may reduce investor confidence and trust in the project. Investors may perceive it as a lack of commitment or accountability from the token’s development team, potentially leading to decreased interest and liquidity in the market.

6. Compliance and Regulatory Risks: Depending on the jurisdiction, renouncing a smart contract may have legal and compliance implications. It’s important to consider the regulatory landscape and ensure that renouncing the contract does not violate any applicable laws or regulations.

It’s worth noting that renouncing a smart contract is a decision that should be carefully evaluated, weighing the potential benefits against the associated drawbacks. It’s advisable to consult with legal and technical experts to fully understand the implications and make an informed decision.

Aside from the above examples, Baby PengolinCoin has already had to change and raise the anti-whale mechanism from 1% to 3%. We also need the ability to exempt addresses from the taxes. For example, in order to run a farming pool the pools address needs to be exempt this is also the case when being listed on a CEX. Other reasons will most likely arise and Baby PengolinCoin needs to be flexible to address those circumstances. By renouncing the smart contract and not having the control to change it, it will only inhibit growth.

Please visit for more information.




Investor, Advisor, Co-Owner of PengolinCoin and Owner of Baby PengolinCoin